A Change in How I Want to Use Twitter…

A while back I watched some video on how to get a bunch of followers on Twitter.  Oddly, at this point in time, I can’t remember why I wanted a lot of followers on Twitter.

The gist of how it worked was one searches Twitter for things that interest them (for me that was stuff involving software development, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web).  Then they clicked on and followed almost anyone that mentions those things (particularly if they are hashed because that means that that is what the tweet is about).  I say “almost” because there are certain indicators that imply you shouldn’t follow someone.  For instance, if they have only tweeted twice and don’t have a profile picture then they probably aren’t into it enough to follow you back and start a dialogue.   Also, if someone unfollows you you unfollow them in kind.  This opens up a “space” for following someone else (due to the limitations of Twitter following that I now believe in more than ever).

The basic idea is to follow people who share an interest, have a high likelihood of following you back, and have a quality Twitter stream.  Then, in 3 or so days you un-follow the people that didn’t follow you back and try again.  This works…if you want a lot of followers (and don’t mind following a bunch of people).  However, I have since found it unsatisfying, and here are three reasons why…

1. Even though there are millions of people on Twitter and the like, I like to keep the web at least somewhat personal.  Following this many people defeats that.  I now am following far more people than I could ever keep up with and am thusly not keeping up with any of them.  There are a small number of people that I would like to follow and keep up with but their streams have since drowned in Twitter chaos.
2. With the exception of a small number of Twitter streams I find more use in following things not people.  For instance, I used a term in a previous post called “Twitter Sniffing”.  This means to continually monitor a particular search on twitter (such as #Lost for the Lost TV show) and see what updates there are concerning it.
3. If you think that a lot of people following you means you have a lot of people that will get your tweets…you’re wrong.  Most of the people who follow you back using this method are already following so many people that you aren’t even on their radar.  Using a hash tag will actually work better because people monitoring that subject will read it and they are who you WANT to read it.

So, in short, I got wrapped up in following and getting followed.  But, it’s no longer how I wish to use Twitter.  I wish to have a small number of people I follow and spend most of my time Twitter Sniffing subjects with an application such as TweetDeck ,which I also mentioned in a previous post.  And, if others feel the same way, then I won’t need a lot of followers because those that are interest in what I’m tweeting will be sniffing for it using Twitter search.

And I’m hoping if, with the advent of tools like TweetDeck, people are starting to care less about following and followers and more about sniffing for particular subjects.  If you follow someone because 1/3 of their tweets are about a subject that interests you, would you need to follow them if you could just sniff for tweets about that subject?  You would not only get tweets about the subject from people that you aren’t following, but you would only get the interesting tweets from those you are following.

The concept of following on Twitter is based on the original intent of the application as a means by which to keep in touch with your friends in real time…which it can still do.  But, that’s not the main use case anymore.  And, I think more and more people will be following subjects (by continually searching for certain keywords and hash tags) more often than other people.

Now…How do I un-follow thousands of people without looking like a jerk?

Related articles by Zemanta

• CNN Loves Twitter, But Doesn’t Seem To Always Know How To Use It (techcrunch.com)
• Test Drive – HootSuite, Ping.FM, TwitterFeed, & Bit.LY (networksboise.wordpress.com)
• Interview: How Tweetdeck Plans To Make Money (paidcontent.org)
• [Social Networking] My Evolving Relationship With Twitter (geeky-guide.com)
• Twitter Muscle – Interview With Co-Founder Susan Preston (howtospoter.com)

Reflection and Meaning on the Web

Most people have heard of the conscious and subconscious mind.  Your conscious mind is the part of your mind you have conscious access to.  Your sub-conscious mind is the part of your mind that you don’t.  Below, I show you how this is mirrored in the web.

The web’s subconscious mind concerns the intelligence that is mined from what people do, without them necessarily knowing it.  This is often done through taking large amounts of search data, and finding interesting patterns in it.  Also, if it’s a site you buy from, then places like Amazon put you into various groups based on your choices and recommend what other people in your groups have chosen.

A lot of times things are done both consciously and subconsciously.  What unites consciousness and subconsciousness?  Two things:  Reflection and Meaning.  We consciously reflect on on what we are doing unconsciously, and we finding meaning with it.

Web 2.0 (the interactive and collaborative web) becomes Web 3.0 (the semantic web or the web of meaning) when it begins to reflect on itself and gives meaning to itself.  And, this is what we are doing when we mark up what we  create with semantic meta-data…such as tagging.

Web 2.0 will become Web 3.0 more and more when meaningful reflection (and the resulting meta-data) becomes a first class citizen of our content.  Meaning allows information to be leveraged in creative new ways.  So, there are some very exiting developments to come, and I definitely want to be part of that.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Web 2.0 to Semantic Web 3.0 (whysup.wordpress.com)
• A challenge for Semantic Intelligence (expertsystem.net)
• Zigtag Puts a Brain into Social Tagging (rotorblog.com)
• Semantic wiki mini series part 5 (mikeaxelrod.com)
• Semantic Web Awareness Barometer 2008 – Preliminary Results (semantic-web.at)
• Flickr Fountain of Knowledge (yahooresearchberkeley.com)
• Lego Man: Why the next web is about meta data, first (sociallyminded.co.uk)

A Simple Case of Twitter Sniffing

I didn’t want to write another Twitter post, but @SmokeyBonesBar made me!  The other night, my wife and I went to Smokey Bones to have dinner.  It’s one of my favorites.  And, to my surprise there was a piece of paper on my table with something handwritten on it in marker.  Oddly it wasn’t on any other table that I saw.  It was definitely speaking to me in particular.  It basically talked about a beer that they had called Vanilla Java Porter, which is basically beer that tastes like coffee.  And, as I soon found out, is AWESOME!  It turns out that beer and coffee are also my favorites.  So, what did I do next?  I tweeted it:

“Having a vanilla java porter at smokey bones. Coffee and beer in one! My two favorites!”

Not an inspired tweet, but accurate and descriptive nonetheless.  Not to mention deeply personal. 

The next day I got on Twitter and, to my surprise, that was retweeted by @SmokeyBonesBar themselves (who also started following me…a favor which I returned).  The following conversation ensued:

Me: @smokeybonesbar I’m really impressed that you found my tweet about you, re-tweeted it, and followed me. That’s quite proactive, and adept.

Me: @smokeybonesbar Oh, and one more thing, do you still have blazin’ shrimp? I couldn’t find them on the menu.

Them: @PureCognition Thanks for the compliment. Smokey Bones has a bit of an ego, and loves to hear what people say about us.

Them:  @PureCognition The Blazin’ Shrimp is still there – just has a new name. “Who You Callin’ Shrimp?”

Me:  @SmokeyBonesBar The previous name (“Blazin’ Shrimp”) was slightly more descriptive, but nevertheless I’ll know what to order now. Thanks.

Me:  @SmokeyBonesBar I really enjoy seeing how businesses use the collaborative web, so your story is very interesting to me.

Do you know how restaurants have waiters and waitresses circle URLs on receipts where you can go and fill out a survey and win stuff?  Most people probably forget to do it…I do.  However, tweeting can be done on the spot and is simple.  Businesses like Smokey Bones know figured that out.  Also, tweets are probably a bit more upfront and honest…Mine are. 

It’s nice to know that businesses like Smokey Bones are Twitter Sniffing to not only find out what their customers are saying, but to also meet them and answer their questions.

Recently, my wife won a 700 dollar grill from Texas Roadhouse through a raffle.  We appreciated it (we were looking for a grill).  But, as strategies go, I like Twitter Sniffing better. 

Recently I posted Seven Types of Web Communities.  I forgot an eighth:

Consumer Communities:   Communites of consumers for a particular business that give feedback and get questions answered.

Also, this is yet another example of one of the faces of twitter.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Smokey Bones New Localized Website (bizzia.com)
• Twtbase (tagedge.com)
• TwtPoll 2: What Local Search Directories Do You Use to Locate Products and Services? (growmap.com)
• The Best Beer In The World! (manolith.com)

Seven Types of Web Communities

Recently, a friend of mind wrote an interesting post on Gather.com called Facebook and Gather Are Not Direct Competitors.  In it, he explains how Gather and Facebook are two different types of web community sites aimed at two different purposes.  This interested me, because I never really thought of it.

I decided that it might be useful to start a dialogue concerning the types of web communities that are out there, and what they target.  I’m not sure that I can always tie a type of community with a specific application, but I’ll try my best.

So, below is my list of seven web communities:

Familial

As stated above, web communities may actually be based on real communities, made up of friends and family.  FaceBook and MySpace are the biggies for this.  Twitter was based on the idea that friends and family could get real-time updates about each other.  It has turned into something altogether different, of course.

Shared Interest

These are communities of people that often don’t know each other personally, but share a common interest that they discuss.  This is a common use for Gather.  Also, there is a good site for discussing books called Shelfari.

Collaborative Creation

This is a community that collaboratively creates things using the web as an online platform.  The major examples of this are wikis like Wikipedia.

Professional

These are communities of professionals that which to develop and maintain their professional network.  LinkedIn is the most common of these.

Economic

These are communites of people that buy and sell goods and services.  Craigslist and eBay are the most common versions of these.

Media and Link Sharing

These are communities of people sharing things that they have found or produced.  YouTube is an example of this for media.  Delicious is an example of this for links.  Twitter is another strong example of this.

Romantic

These are the types of communities used to find “that special someone”.  These are often not free.  The only one that comes to mind is eHarmony.

The online communities we belong to help us nurture the different aspects of our personal and social lives.  Humans have so many aspects to them that I’m sure that the above is not an exhaustive list.  I would like to hear about other types that could be added to the above.  If you can think of one, please drop me a comment.

I also want to add the disclaimer that some of the applications above, like Facebook, actually facilitate more than one of the types of communities above.  I mentioned it for what I use it the most for.  Sorry for my lack of objectivity. 

Related articles by Zemanta

• Social Networking Sites That are on Top of the Charts (frugalwahmstalkradio.com)
• Facebook Isn’t For Your Kids Anymore (kylelacy.com)
• You’ve been served – on Facebook (textually.org)
• Social media is here to stay… Now what? (vator.tv)
• More insights on Facebook, Twitter and Myspace from danah boyd (lsvp.wordpress.com)
• Facebook Pages Get More Business Friendly (ducttapemarketing.com)

Our Story: Distributed Identity in Web 2.0

Often we think of our online identities in terms of our logins, passwords, and various other ids.  Identity Theft is theft of these things.  But, in terms of the collaborative web, there is a great deal more…our story.

Our identity can me measured by our story and our story is made up of what we do.

In terms of Web 2.0, what we do is:

• Write articles
• Comment on articles
• Modify wiki articles
• Upload media such as pictures and video
• Decorate content with metadata such as tags
• Blog
• Micro-blog
• Contribute to open source

When you join an online community and begin interacting, your story can be told in two directions inward and outward.  The former tells the members of the community who you are by telling them what you have been up to outside of the community.  The latter tells people outside of the community what you’ve done inside the community.  You, I assume, are interested in both directions…I am.  Below is how these directions work in practice:

Inward Identity Sharing

Importing what you do at other sites is usually done by importing from those sites.  You usually do this by giving the community links to feeds and/or profiles from these other sites.  The community can then keep track of what you are doing elsewhere.

Outward Identity Sharing

Exporting from the community is done by giving addresses of your feeds and/or profiles from a given site to other sites.  These other sites can then keep tabs on what you are doing in that community.

Sites like FriendFeed and FaceBook actually do both directions rather well.  Other applications don’t.  FriendFeed , in particular, even broadcasts both directions…acting as a thirdparty broadcaster.

Personally, I think that this is an important dimension to judge an online community.  By honoring your users’ story, you honor them.  This respect won’t go unrewarded.  Users want this because they want their story told…everywhere.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Web Technology: Impact on Social Media and Community (socialmediatoday.com)
• Twitter Compared to IM, Email and Forums (socialmediatoday.com)
• The day that Web 2.0 swallowed the sugar cubes (inquisitr.com)